Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01570
Original file (BC 2013 01570.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01570

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She receive a waiver of the recoupment of the debt she owes related to her United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) education.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She questions the validity of the basis for recoupment of her USAFA education debt due to the ambiguous language contained in AFI 36-3206, Administrative Discharge Procedure for Commissioned Officers, and AFI 36-3207, Separating Commissioned Officers.  Specifically, these instructions characterize causes for involuntary and voluntary separations, none of which included the reason for her separation.  As a result of being twice passed over for promotion to captain, she was unable to complete her outstanding active duty service commitment (ADSC); as a result she incurred a debt related to her USAFA education.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.  

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate she was commissioned in the Regular Air Force on 28 May 08.

In accordance with AFI 36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments (ADSC), the applicant incurred a five-year ADSC after her entry on active duty.  

On 31 Mar 13, the applicant was honorably discharged, with a narrative reason for separation of “Non-Selection, Permanent Promotion,” and was issued a separation program designator (SPD) code of “JGB” and RE code of “Not Applicable.”  She was credited with 4 years, 10 months, and 3 days of total active service.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by DFAS and the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DFAS recommends relief be granted, indicating that there are competing statutes and implementing directives which prevented the applicant from fulfilling her five-year ADSC.  Specifically, 10 USC § 2005 and 37 USC § 303a indicate recoupment of education assistance if the member fails to complete the prescribed ADSC; and 10 USC § 631, indicate the statutory requirement that a member who fails two promotion opportunities to the grade of captain must be separated by the first day of the seventh month after the promotion is approved.  In this case, the applicant’s promotion opportunity was reduced in calendar year 2011 and 2012 and she was not selected for promotion to captain in October 2012.  By law, the applicant had to separate from active duty no later than 1 May 2013.  As a result, she was two months shy of fulfilling her five-year ADSC.  It was legally impossible for the applicant to fulfill her commitment and she asked for an earlier separation date of 31 March 2013, one month prior to her maximum date of release from active duty.  In accordance with Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (DoDFMR), Volume 7A, chapter 2, paragraph 020203, as a general rule, repayment action will not be pursued in situations in which the member’s inability to fulfill specified service conditions related to a pay or benefit is due to circumstances determined reasonably beyond the member’s control.  It seems clear that Federal and Air Force policy prevented the applicant from fulfilling her ADSC and the debt should be remitted.  

A complete copy of DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

AFPC/DPSOO makes no recommendation, but indicates the applicant met and was non-selected for promotion by the CY11C (P0311C) and the CY12C (P0312C) Captain Line Central Selection Boards.  There are no provisions in policy or law that allow a twice deferred lieutenant to remain on active duty.  As a result, the applicant was required to separate.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D.

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating in accordance with AFI 36-3207, the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant’s discharge due to her second non-selection for promotion to captain.  Also, in accordance with USC Title 37, Pay and Allowance of the Uniformed Services, a member paid a bonus, incentive pay, or similar benefit in which the receipt is contingent upon the member’s satisfaction of certain service or eligibility, shall repay the United States any unearned portion if the member fails to fulfill their requirement.  In this case, the applicant was not selected for promotion and was given a SPD code which authorized recoupment of the unearned portion of her educational benefits.  The applicant’s SDP code was the reason for her recoupment and not the AFI that was applied to her separation.  Therefore, recoupment should be applied to the applicant’s situation.  

A complete copy of AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  The applicant contends that the debt she incurred related to her Air Force Academy education was unfairly levied because she was unable to complete her outstanding ADSC due to circumstances beyond her control.  We considered the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of DFAS and adopt its rationale as the basis of our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an injustice.  While we note the comments by AFPC/DPSOR indicating that by law and directive, the applicant could not remain on active duty since she was twice passed over for promotion, in our view, while it appears the provisions of the applicable directives were correctly applied, we believe the applicant is the victim of an injustice.  In this respect, we note the applicant was unable to fulfill her active duty service commitment due to circumstances beyond her control; specifically, she was non-selection for promotion, which resulted in the establishment of her mandatory separation date (MSD).  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, we believe that it would be in the interest of justice to waive repayment of the contested debt associated with the unearned portion of the applicant’s educational cost.  Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected as indicated below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority approved her request to waive recoupment of the unearned portion of the debt related to her United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) education.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01570 in Executive Session on 13 Feb 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Mar 13, w/atchs.  
	 Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	 Exhibit C.  Letter, DFAS, dated 16 Sep 13, w/atchs.  
	 Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 7 Oct 13.  
	 Exhibit E.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 8 Oct 13.
	 Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair






2






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05064

    Original file (BC 2013 05064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    303a(e) which states “if a member under a written agreement for pay or benefit does not fulfill the service conditions for the pay or benefit, then repayment of the unearned portion of the pay or benefit will be sought, unless the Secretary of the military department concerned (or designee) makes a case-by-case determination that to require repayment of an unearned portion of the pay or benefit would be contrary to a personnel policy of management objective, against equity or good...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00325

    Original file (BC-2011-00325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits B, C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial. JA states that the first and only notice the applicant received that the Air Force intended to seek recoupment of the pro-rata cost of his USAFA education was the letter from AFPC/CC, dated 26 April 2010,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02399

    Original file (BC-2012-02399.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant separated under the provisions of PALACE CHASE on 1 January 2012 with a separation program designator of KGQ – PALACE CHASE. The applicant separated from active duty via the PALACE CHASE program and the only SPD code for members separating after fulfilling their military service obligation is KGQ. The applicant separated from active duty with a debt of $2,468.98 due to an unearned portion of a bonus.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360

    Original file (BC 2014 00360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code “JBK.” Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code “JBK.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04015

    Original file (BC-2012-04015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 May 2010, an AF Form 4363, Record of Promotion Propriety Action, was initiated by the applicant’s commander, notifying him of his recommendation to delay the applicant’s 28 May 2010 promotion to first lieutenant (O-2) until 27 November 2010 due to his failure to meet exemplary conduct standards. On 11 June 2010, the applicant acknowledged the final decision of his promotion delay until 27 November 2010. However, the applicant’s promotion was delayed by the initiating commander before...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02261

    Original file (BC-2011-02261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed to 1 Oct 10 and recoupment of his debt of $57,000.00 be stopped. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMF2 recommends changing the applicant's retirement...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00295

    Original file (BC-2001-00295.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, General Law Division, HQ USAF/JAG, noted that Section 2005 provides for recoupment if a member fails to complete the ADSC voluntarily or due to misconduct. On 14 Aug 01, DFAS-POCC/DE advised the applicant that, based on her placement on the TDRL, it was inappropriate at this time to recoup monies which might not be owed if...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01564

    Original file (BC-2011-01564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given an honorable characterization of service with a separation code of “JHF” and narrative reason of “Failure to Complete a Course of Instruction.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated advisory opinion, AFPC/DPSIP opines that based on their review, they found no problems with the applicant’s consideration by the Initial Skills Training (IST) panel and that the decision to recoup a pro-rated educational assistance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02233

    Original file (BC-2007-02233.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he left the USAFA he made the wrong decision to reimburse the Air Force for his debt he incurred for his education, rather than serve on active duty as an enlisted member. He requested to be considered for an educational delay to pursue an Air Force Reserve Officer Training Commission and was given until 17 Jun 05, to submit additional matters to support his request. The SECAF granted his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00004

    Original file (BC-2011-00004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00004 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a waiver of the recoupment of his pro-rata share of unserved active duty service commitment (ADSC) associated with his United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) scholarship. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained...